FOR THE LAST half-century, a deadly fungus has exhausted populations of frogs and salamanders around the world. referred to as chytrid, it's driven the decline or extinction of a minimum of 500 species, making it the world’s most destructive pathogen in terms of biodiversity loss.
Naturally, that’s bad news for the animals that prey on amphibians. But scientists know almost nothing about the contagious fungus’ impacts on food webs round the world.
Now, a replacement study published in the week in Science suggests that the amphibian decline has taken an important toll on tropical snake species that prey on frogs. After the disease swept through Panama’s Parque Nacional Omar Torrijos Herrera beginning in 2004, the general number, diversity, and health of snakes declined significantly, the paper found. That’s likely true for other amphibian predators also, the authors say.
There’s a high probability that a minimum of a dozen snake species disappeared from the world and maybe more, says Elise Zipkin, a study co-author and quantitative biologist at Michigan State University.
The striking decline in snakes is probably going to possess its own ecological effects and hints at a way broader impact to the general food cycle.
Seven green parrot snakes (Leptophis depressirostris) were seen during a Panamanian park before the chytrid fungus arrived, creating an "amphibian apocalypse." Afterward, despite intensive surveys over eight years, none were found.
“It needs to be affecting the birds and therefore the mammals, and everything else,” says Julie Ray, another co-author and an adjunct professor at the University of Nevada, Reno.
That’s why the study should matter “even to people that won't like snakes,” she adds.
Snake loss
While it's going to seem obvious that a decline in amphibians could impact its predators, showing that this is often true requires having long-term data from a specific site, which is extremely rare and difficult to achieve, says Kelly Zamudio, an ecology professor and herpetology curator at Cornell University who wasn’t involved within the paper.
Observations and data for the study were painstakingly collected during on-the-ground wildlife surveys over quite 13 years within the Panamanian park, near the community of El Copé, about half before and a half after chytrid swept through the world.
The data alone was enough to suggest that chytrid was indirectly harming the snakes. Before the fungal invasion, the scientists recorded seeing 30 different species; afterward, they found 21, and in far fewer quantities. Of the species that were seen five or more times, quite half were seen less often afterward.
But many of the species are very rare: Thirteen of the 36 snake species the researchers saw over their 13 years within the field were spotted just one occasion. Many others were seen only a couple of times. That raises the question: How does one estimate species abundance with such few sightings?
Zipkin used a mathematical model to infer population trends supported the snake sightings, which suggests that a lot of those rare species went locally extinct, which the world lost a minimum of a dozen species.
The paper suggests there’s a “striking shrinking... and homogenization of the population,” Zamudio says. “The community is forever changed,” she says, “and many species could also be completely gone.”
“To me, that’s a fantastic example of how important it's to gather data like this,” Zamudio says.
‘It just really hits you’
Co-author Ray, who collected data within the same Panamanian park for eight years, didn't begin to seem at the impact of the fungus, referred to as Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). In fact, it arrived just before she started her data collection in 2005. (Learn more: Amphibian 'apocalypse' caused by most destructive pathogen ever.)
The task at the time was to count the number of snakes and learn what they ate, as a part of a doctoral study on two genera that were thought to mainly eat snails, just like the Argus snail sucker (Sibon argus), a slender serpent with a blunt head and slightly protruding eyes.
As it seems, the snail-sucker doesn’t really suck snails, as previously thought. Rather, it preys totally on frog eggs—which became a drag. Before the fungus came through, researchers, including co-author Karen Lips at the University of Maryland, recorded seeing the animals 149 times. But that number declined by an element of three post-fungus, and people animals that Ray did encounter were often emaciated and malnourished, she says.
Snakes like these, she explains, sometimes only eat once a year—and so that they can survive, albeit during a sorry state, for an extended time after their prey has vanished.
Ray, who previously worked in two other sites in Panama before starting at the El Copé study site, watched as frogs began to perish. Within six months of chytrid’s arrival, the overwhelming majority of frogs died, their bodies piling up in streams.
“It's insane what percentage more frogs you'll see pre-decline than you'll after,” she says. Previous research by Lips et al. found that chytrid reduced amphibian abundance by 75 percent within the area, and led to the extirpation of a minimum of 30 species. (Read more: half all amphibian species in danger of extinction.)
But then, her study species—snakes—began to be affected. Going out each night, she would find fewer and fewer snakes.
“Partly you’re so trapped within the moment, trying to urge the info,” she says. But eventually, it becomes clear that “these are real numbers connected to real animals. It just really hits you.”
Up and down the food cycle
The loss of amphibians will produce other ecological impacts besides those on snakes. Moving down the organic phenomenon, removal of frog tadpoles has been shown to steer to more algae growth in streams, depriving them of oxygen. Moving up the online, the loss of the snakes has its own repercussions.
“The snakes are so important for the environment, if you're taking them out, the entire thing can collapse,” Ray adds.
“I suspect there are likely additional predators and prey that are impacted by the loss of amphibians,” concurs Jamie Voyles, a biologist at the University of Nevada, Reno, who wasn’t involved within the work.
“This study also underscores the devastation that chytridiomycosis”—the technical name for the pathogenic infection—“and emerging infectious diseases, generally, can wear the online of life,” she adds. “It shows that emerging infectious diseases can have impacts that reach beyond anything we previously understood.”
Luckily, there are glimmers of hope, with a little subset of amphibian species showing signs of resistance; some populations are starting to slowly recover. a couple of snake species were also ready to switch to different prey, like lizards, and a few serpents that don’t eat amphibians appear to extend in number, likely thanks to reduced competition.
But chytrid's effects are just starting to be understood—and will undoubtedly be long-lasting or permanent.
Naturally, that’s bad news for the animals that prey on amphibians. But scientists know almost nothing about the contagious fungus’ impacts on food webs round the world.
Now, a replacement study published in the week in Science suggests that the amphibian decline has taken an important toll on tropical snake species that prey on frogs. After the disease swept through Panama’s Parque Nacional Omar Torrijos Herrera beginning in 2004, the general number, diversity, and health of snakes declined significantly, the paper found. That’s likely true for other amphibian predators also, the authors say.
There’s a high probability that a minimum of a dozen snake species disappeared from the world and maybe more, says Elise Zipkin, a study co-author and quantitative biologist at Michigan State University.
The striking decline in snakes is probably going to possess its own ecological effects and hints at a way broader impact to the general food cycle.
Seven green parrot snakes (Leptophis depressirostris) were seen during a Panamanian park before the chytrid fungus arrived, creating an "amphibian apocalypse." Afterward, despite intensive surveys over eight years, none were found.
“It needs to be affecting the birds and therefore the mammals, and everything else,” says Julie Ray, another co-author and an adjunct professor at the University of Nevada, Reno.
That’s why the study should matter “even to people that won't like snakes,” she adds.
Snake loss
While it's going to seem obvious that a decline in amphibians could impact its predators, showing that this is often true requires having long-term data from a specific site, which is extremely rare and difficult to achieve, says Kelly Zamudio, an ecology professor and herpetology curator at Cornell University who wasn’t involved within the paper.
Observations and data for the study were painstakingly collected during on-the-ground wildlife surveys over quite 13 years within the Panamanian park, near the community of El Copé, about half before and a half after chytrid swept through the world.
The data alone was enough to suggest that chytrid was indirectly harming the snakes. Before the fungal invasion, the scientists recorded seeing 30 different species; afterward, they found 21, and in far fewer quantities. Of the species that were seen five or more times, quite half were seen less often afterward.
But many of the species are very rare: Thirteen of the 36 snake species the researchers saw over their 13 years within the field were spotted just one occasion. Many others were seen only a couple of times. That raises the question: How does one estimate species abundance with such few sightings?
Zipkin used a mathematical model to infer population trends supported the snake sightings, which suggests that a lot of those rare species went locally extinct, which the world lost a minimum of a dozen species.
The paper suggests there’s a “striking shrinking... and homogenization of the population,” Zamudio says. “The community is forever changed,” she says, “and many species could also be completely gone.”
“To me, that’s a fantastic example of how important it's to gather data like this,” Zamudio says.
‘It just really hits you’
Co-author Ray, who collected data within the same Panamanian park for eight years, didn't begin to seem at the impact of the fungus, referred to as Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). In fact, it arrived just before she started her data collection in 2005. (Learn more: Amphibian 'apocalypse' caused by most destructive pathogen ever.)
The task at the time was to count the number of snakes and learn what they ate, as a part of a doctoral study on two genera that were thought to mainly eat snails, just like the Argus snail sucker (Sibon argus), a slender serpent with a blunt head and slightly protruding eyes.
As it seems, the snail-sucker doesn’t really suck snails, as previously thought. Rather, it preys totally on frog eggs—which became a drag. Before the fungus came through, researchers, including co-author Karen Lips at the University of Maryland, recorded seeing the animals 149 times. But that number declined by an element of three post-fungus, and people animals that Ray did encounter were often emaciated and malnourished, she says.
Snakes like these, she explains, sometimes only eat once a year—and so that they can survive, albeit during a sorry state, for an extended time after their prey has vanished.
Ray, who previously worked in two other sites in Panama before starting at the El Copé study site, watched as frogs began to perish. Within six months of chytrid’s arrival, the overwhelming majority of frogs died, their bodies piling up in streams.
“It's insane what percentage more frogs you'll see pre-decline than you'll after,” she says. Previous research by Lips et al. found that chytrid reduced amphibian abundance by 75 percent within the area, and led to the extirpation of a minimum of 30 species. (Read more: half all amphibian species in danger of extinction.)
But then, her study species—snakes—began to be affected. Going out each night, she would find fewer and fewer snakes.
“Partly you’re so trapped within the moment, trying to urge the info,” she says. But eventually, it becomes clear that “these are real numbers connected to real animals. It just really hits you.”
Up and down the food cycle
The loss of amphibians will produce other ecological impacts besides those on snakes. Moving down the organic phenomenon, removal of frog tadpoles has been shown to steer to more algae growth in streams, depriving them of oxygen. Moving up the online, the loss of the snakes has its own repercussions.
“The snakes are so important for the environment, if you're taking them out, the entire thing can collapse,” Ray adds.
“I suspect there are likely additional predators and prey that are impacted by the loss of amphibians,” concurs Jamie Voyles, a biologist at the University of Nevada, Reno, who wasn’t involved within the work.
“This study also underscores the devastation that chytridiomycosis”—the technical name for the pathogenic infection—“and emerging infectious diseases, generally, can wear the online of life,” she adds. “It shows that emerging infectious diseases can have impacts that reach beyond anything we previously understood.”
Luckily, there are glimmers of hope, with a little subset of amphibian species showing signs of resistance; some populations are starting to slowly recover. a couple of snake species were also ready to switch to different prey, like lizards, and a few serpents that don’t eat amphibians appear to extend in number, likely thanks to reduced competition.
But chytrid's effects are just starting to be understood—and will undoubtedly be long-lasting or permanent.
Follow Us